CRA denies teach driving force’s work-away-from-home prices, is taken to court docket

Article content material

Some taxpayers attempt to write off the price of attending to paintings as a deductible expense for tax functions. However as opposed to the strange remarkable case, the ones bills are denied for the reason that Canada Earnings Company usually considers the price of using backward and forward between domestic and paintings as a non-deductible private expense.

Article content material

However what if making a decision to stick at a lodge close to your employer’s place of work all over the workweek to reduce your day-to-day go back and forth? Are you able to write off the price of your accommodation, together with the price of foods whilst dwelling close to your paintings? Neatly, you’ll definitely check out. One Ontario taxpayer did and nearly were given away with it, till the CRA challenged the taxpayer’s employment bills and the subject ended up in Tax Court docket.

Article content material

The hot case concerned a commuter teach operator for GO Transit, the regional public transit provider for the Better Toronto and Hamilton Space. The activity required him to paintings from quite a lot of teach stations throughout Ontario. The taxpayer usually resided in Prince Edward County, and the corporate’s domestic terminal used to be Toronto’s Union Station.

Article content material

The taxpayer reported taxable source of revenue of $130,640 in 2014 and $110,729 in 2015, and claimed employment bills on his tax go back of $17,604 and $20,408, respectively. The employment bills consisted in large part of accommodation bills (about $11,000 in 2014 and $14,700 in 2015), and foods (just about $6,000 in 2014 and $5,700 in 2015).

The CRA to start with assessed his tax returns for 2014 and 2015 as filed, however the company therefore reassessed the taxpayer in 2016 and denied all his employment bills for each years.

The taxpayer defined he used to be required as a commuter teach operator to paintings from quite a lot of teach stations forming a part of the GO Transit community. On the trial, the taxpayer testified that during a standard running week, he would go away his domestic in Prince Edward County on Sunday afternoon and head via automobile to Oshawa, returning domestic best on Friday evenings after his week’s ultimate shift used to be over. The using distance between his domestic and Oshawa is roughly 160 kilometres, representing a using time of just about two hours.

Article content material

The taxpayer additional defined that he in most cases began and completed paintings on the Oshawa GO teach station and no longer at his employer’s domestic terminal positioned in Toronto. Whilst clear of domestic, he every so often stayed at a lodge with regards to the Oshawa GO station or in Pickering, the place he rented an condo close to its GO station for a length of six or seven months in 2014, at a value of $9,500. He rented a unique Pickering condo in 2015 at a value of $5,520, and commuted from there to the Oshawa GO station the place he labored.

There’s a particular rule within the Source of revenue Tax Act that permits transportation workers who’re frequently required to be clear of their domestic municipality to deduct unreimbursed meals and accommodation employment bills. To be entitled to deduct those bills, a number of stipulations should be met.

Article content material

First, the employer’s fundamental industry should be transporting passengers, items or a mix of each. The taxpayer could also be required to frequently go back and forth clear of the municipality the place the employer’s established order is positioned (this is, the place the taxpayer reported to paintings). As well as, the taxpayer should go back and forth on automobiles utilized by the employer to move the ones items or passengers. In spite of everything, the taxpayer should be required via their tasks of employment to pay for foods and accommodation whilst clear of their domestic municipality.

The worker on this case had a correctly finished and signed Canada Earnings Company Shape T2200, Declaration of Stipulations of Employment, on which his employer qualified he used to be required to pay quite a lot of kinds of bills for which he would no longer be reimbursed. Below the “Stipulations of employment” phase, his employer mentioned he used to be required to go back and forth to places that weren’t his place of work whilst appearing his employment tasks.

Article content material

The shape additionally famous that the employer required the worker to be away for 12 consecutive hours from the municipality and the metropolitan house the place he automatically reported for paintings. His employer mentioned at the T2200 shape that it does no longer reimburse employment bills incurred via its workers.

The worker additionally finished and filed signed copies of the particular shape for transit workers, Shape TL2, Claims for foods and accommodation bills, which the taxpayer hooked up to his 2014 and 2015 tax returns.

Article content material

Throughout his testimony, the taxpayer testified his day-to-day paintings shift used to be greater than 12 hours consistent with day, and he gave details about particular routes to turn that. But if cross-examined about his day-to-day paintings shift, the taxpayer known “that lots of his routes lasted lower than 12 hours and had been topic to separate shifts with interruption instances.”

In line with the proof, the pass judgement on stated the taxpayer had no longer established that his tasks of employment required him to frequently go back and forth clear of Oshawa, and clear of the metropolitan house the place his employer used to be positioned, thus necessitating him to incur bills for foods and accommodation. The pass judgement on famous that Oshawa is within the Durham Area, which is within the Better Toronto Space. The taxpayer, subsequently, used to be no longer ready to determine that the employment bills he claimed had been incurred out of doors the metropolitan house the place he reported to paintings.

“The deductions … (are) no longer meant for workers who make a decision, for private causes, no longer to go back to their properties on the finish of each and every running day,” the pass judgement on concluded.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Making plans with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

_____________________________________________________________

In the event you preferred this tale, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

_____________________________________________________________